<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SeroTalk Podcast 116: Just Stupidly Different	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/07/26/serotalk-podcast-116-just-stupidly-different/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2012/07/26/serotalk-podcast-116-just-stupidly-different/</link>
	<description>A podcast and interactive blog on the accessible digital lifestyle, produced by Serotek, the Accessibility Anywhere people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Larges		</title>
		<link>/2012/07/26/serotalk-podcast-116-just-stupidly-different/comment-page-1/#comment-2746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Larges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1867#comment-2746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The comments on the show defending the pricing of Fleksy are right on, but what isn&#039;t said is that such added expenses leaves apps like this and other technologies outside the budgets of many blind and low vision users. In a community that is still largely either unemployed or way under employed, questions about affordability shouldn&#039;t be brushed off so easily. The point isn&#039;t that apps like Fleksy aren&#039;t worth the cost, or that the cost in itself isn&#039;t unreasonable, given the limited market and the investment of the company producing it, but that even $15 can represent a hardship for lots of blind folks.Sure, some of the complaining about the price of AT comes from folks who feel like they are being overcharged, when this isn&#039;t the case; but others are simply lamenting the fact that AT, and potentially really helpful apps like Fleksy cost more than they can spend.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments on the show defending the pricing of Fleksy are right on, but what isn&#8217;t said is that such added expenses leaves apps like this and other technologies outside the budgets of many blind and low vision users. In a community that is still largely either unemployed or way under employed, questions about affordability shouldn&#8217;t be brushed off so easily. The point isn&#8217;t that apps like Fleksy aren&#8217;t worth the cost, or that the cost in itself isn&#8217;t unreasonable, given the limited market and the investment of the company producing it, but that even $15 can represent a hardship for lots of blind folks.Sure, some of the complaining about the price of AT comes from folks who feel like they are being overcharged, when this isn&#8217;t the case; but others are simply lamenting the fact that AT, and potentially really helpful apps like Fleksy cost more than they can spend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
